Torah 101

Simple essays to explain the Torah, its concepts, how it works, and what it means. A tall order, but your reach should always exceed your grasp.

My Photo
Name:

"I blog, therefore I am". Clearly not true, or I wouldn't exist except every now and then.

Friday, May 19, 2006

What is the Torah?

This is reprinted from my website (http://www.starways.net/lisa/essays/torah.html) with some small modifications. It's extremely sketchy, and I hope to flesh it out a bit as we go on.

Torah is the term used for the body of knowledge revealed on Mount Sinai to the Israelites as they were on their way from Egypt to Canaan following the Exodus. It is made up of two parts: the Written Torah, which is more widely known as the Pentateuch, or Five Books of Moses, and the Oral Torah.

Contrary to various misunderstandings and mistranslations, the Oral Torah is not a commentary on the Written Torah. It would be more accurate (though still an approximation of the truth) to say that the Written Torah is a mnemonic device whose purpose is to make the vastly larger Oral Torah more manageable.

The Oral Torah has two parts. These are referred to today as Niglah ("Revealed") and Nistar ("Hidden"). The part known as Niglah is much more widely known and is divided into six subdivisions:

Zeraim ("Seeds")
Deals essentially with agricultural law. The first sub-subdivision is called Berakhot ("Benedictions") and is probably included in Zeraim because of the requirement to recite a benediction before eating.

Moed ("Festival")
Deals with the laws of the Sabbath and other holy days.

Nashim ("Women")
Deals with issues relating to marriage and divorce.

Nezikim ("Damages")
Deals with what has been termed "civil law." Business law, contract law, torts, etc.

Kodshim ("Sacrifices")
Deals with laws applicable to the Temple service.

Taharot ("Purifications")
Deals with laws of tumah and taharah, sometimes translated as "ritual purity" and "ritual impurity".

The part of Torah called Nistar is also known as Kabbalah. Contrary to wild fantasies on the parts of such academic "experts" as Gershom Scholem, Kabbalah is not "Rabbinic Mysticism." It is not mysticism of any sort whatsoever. It is a kind of advanced study that can be thought of as being analogous to the most arcane fields of physics being studied today. It is an area that is unnecessary for proper understanding of Niglah, and in fact, due to the various religions in the world that have incorporated bits and pieces of Nistar into them, it is extremely easy to be misled about the meaning of Nistar unless one has a thorough grounding in Niglah.

There are three subdivisions of Nistar/Kabbalah:

Theoretical
This is essentially cosmology. It provides a valuable picture of the way the world is put together. Again, it is thoroughly unnecessary, but in our day, when so many people are seeking deep and penetrating knowledge of the world around us, there may be some value to learning this.

The best (and only authorized) book on this topic for the layman is Rabbi Aryeh Kaplan's Inner Space, which can be purchased at most Jewish book stores.

Meditative
This deals with methods of attaining states of consciousness which permit a person to see past the filter of the world more deeply into the fullness of existence. Honestly, even though this sounds freaky, it's actually completely normal. Think of those Magic Eye pictures, where only by focussing in a particular way can you see past the stuff on the top to the underlying picture. Many people can stare and stare and never see the picture underneath. But with the correct instructions, most people can, eventually. Meditative Kabbalah is essentially the instructions necessary to see the "picture" of reality. The highest levels of this are what we call prophecy.

Practical
Kids, don't try this at home. Ready for more weirdness? This is basically magic. Don't laugh. Arthur C. Clarke wrote that, "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." When we call this magic, it simply means that it is a method (methods, actually) of manipulating the reality one learns to perceive through the Meditative Kabbalah to achieve physical effects in the world. The Golem is probably the most famous example of Practical Kabbalah. But no joke: this is way too dangerous to even consider trying. As hokey as it sounds, people have spontaneously combusted trying it, and no reputable teacher will give you the time of day unless you are a serious master of all of Niglah and the beginning parts of Nistar.

This corpus of knowledge, not all of which is legal, but explanatory, was transmitted by word of mouth over the many centuries from the Revelation until the present day. There were phases of this transmission, which accounts for the difference between the way things are today and the way they were when the Torah was first given.

Up until the destruction of the First Temple by the Babylonians, Niglah was taught to everyone. The Sages teach us that at the time of King Hezekiah (a contemporary and son-in-law of the prophet Isaiah), even small children knew the most complex laws of ritual purity. It was just so much a part of the culture that everyone knew it. Nistar was taught in groups, or bands, of students. It was comparable to the difference today between simple arithmetic and quark physics.

The incredible and seemingly primitive and idiotic attraction of idolatry during the First Temple period was due to the fact that it actually worked. The "prophets" of crackpot religions such as Ba'al worship learned techniques that were part of Nistar and abused them in order to gain followers. Because of the role of idolatry in the destruction and Exile, the Sages of the time, known to us as the Men of the Great Assembly, decreed that Nistar could no longer be taught in public, and in fact, could not be taught to more than very select students, one at a time. This had the effect of damping out the plague of idolatry in Israel, but pretty much ended prophecy as well.

The Men of the Great Assembly also formulated the laws of Niglah into a set form, which were eventually collected into the Mishnah (and some other collections). The reason for this was that with the majority of the Jews living under foreign rulers, whose caprices could wipe out whole communities at any time, a slightly more rigid formulation could make the difference between the preservation or loss of the Torah. Even so, this Mishnah was only a further mnemonic device for the entirety of Niglah, and continued to be transmitted orally.

Following the destruction of the Second Temple by the Romans, and the resultant chaos, the Sages of the time, known to us at the Tanaim, began to collect Mishnaic statements, with the intent of editing them into an authoritative corpus. The main force behind this effort was Rabbi Akiva, and the work was completed under the auspices of Rabbi Judah the Prince.

Once the Mishnah had reached all the various Jewish communities, it became a unifying force. But the situation continued to deteriorate. The Mishnah, and other collections of Mishnaic statements that had not made it into the final cut, continued to be discussed by the Sages of the time, who were now known as Amoraim. These discussion themselves did not add to the information contained in the Mishnah, but spelled it out more explicitly. The Amoraim knew that given current conditions, things would only get worse, and that each progressive generation would have a less certain understanding of the Mishnah. So they preserved their discussions, which were eventually edited into what we have today as the Gemara. The combination of the Mishnah and the Gemara is known as the Talmud.

All rabbinic literature subsequent to the Talmud (as regards Niglah) is commentary, explication, and the application of Talmudic principles to situations which arose from time to time. The Talmud itself is, with all its gaps, the essential corpus of Niglah. It must, perforce, be treated as if it is the living word of Hashem, as transmitted to Moses on Mount Sinai. And in fact, we have God's promise that the Torah will never be lost, and the chain of tradition never broken:

"And for My part, this is My covenant with them," said Hashem. "My spirit which is upon them, and the words I have set in their mouths, shall not be lost from their mouths, or from their children's mouths, or from their children's children's mouths," said Hashem, "from now until eternity."

The history of Nistar, due to its status as "hidden", was quite different. As with Niglah, Rabbi Akiva was one of the key players in its transmission. Rabbi Shimon bar Yochai, however, was responsible for compiling one of the most authoritative collections of Kabbalistic knowledge in his work, the Zohar. But the Zohar itself was transmitted orally until the 12th century, when the Kabbalist Moshe de Leon committed it to writing. It remains the least understood part of the Torah, except on the part of a handful of Sages alive today.

On the subject of Kabbalah, I want to note the comment of R' Adin Steinsaltz, who said that the connection between pop-culture Kabbalah and the real thing "is the relationship between pornography and love." So stay far away from cultie versions of Kabbalah.

6 Comments:

Blogger JoeSettler said...

The history of Nistar, ... But the Zohar itself was transmitted orally until the 12th century, when the Kabbalist Moshe de Leon committed it to writing. It remains the least understood part of the Torah, except on the part of a handful of Sages alive today.

Any chance you might expand on this?

10:31 AM  
Blogger Lisa said...

I'm not sure what you mean. You bolded the part about de Leon committing it to writing. I think there's a fairly wide consensus that the precise wording of the Zohar could not have been formulated by R' Shimon bar Yochai. And there are certainly no texts of the Zohar that predate de Leon.

Do you mean expanding as in addressing the views of some people that de Leon actually created the Zohar himself, rather than writing down something that had been transmitted orally up until that time?

Or something else? Honestly, I'm not sure what you mean.

10:50 AM  
Blogger JoeSettler said...

I was addressing the views that claim de Leon made it up.

I was wondering if you could give your opinion on the veracity and history of the book and its contents.

11:32 AM  
Blogger Lisa said...

Joe, hi. I'm not a Kabbalist. Nor the daughter of a Kabbalist. <grin>

Most of what I know about Nistar comes from books by R' Aryeh Kaplan. As to why I think the Zohar is for real... it's two things, really, which combine into one.

I think R' Kaplan makes a lot of sense. And he's not alone. Both Hasidish and non-Hasidish schools of thought hold that the Zohar is for real.

I reject the idea that all of Judaism could become corrupted for centuries. All we have to go on is the chain of tradition. Reform movements (and I'm not referring to the Reform Movement, which is not, ironically enough, an actual reform movement) are movements which say just that. "Something went off the tracks some ways back, and we have to backtrack to where that mistake was made, and try again from there."

If something went off the tracks in Judaism, in the way the Zohar has been accepted as part and parcel of Judaism, then we're sunk. Because there's no way to go back at this point without losing that chain of tradition.

On the other hand, we have a clear promise from Hashem, which I quoted in an earlier entry, that says we're never going to go off the tracks in such a way.

The way I figure it, rejecting all of Judaism could be a consistent position. Accepting Judaism, and the Zohar with it, could be a consistent position. But accepting Judaism and rejecting the Zohar... that ship has sailed. It's not a consistent position at this point in history.

10:15 AM  
Blogger JoeSettler said...

(Cute first line)
1) Yet, why does it seem that so many Rabbis who should have been familiar with the book, weren't. (I'm not talking about some of the contents, but the text itself?

2) Why weren't many of the acts that Kabbala states as the preferred methodology performed before the book was introduced (even though a lot is from Lurian Kabbala which the Ari seems to have introduced).

3) I’m not familiar with the specific reference regarding Hashem’s promise that we won’t go off the tracks in such a way. But it does seem to me that there have been some times that we Jews have accepted certain ideas or customs and certainly maintained them out of fear, ignorance, and superstition more than anything else. A signifgicant number of Jews ran after Shabtai Tzvi. The Rambam certainly seems to rail against an “irrational” Judaism containing demons and amulets, yet they have become quite acceptable in certain circles, and we can’t get rid of certain minhagim which we 100% know are no longer relevant, because we are afraid to tamper.

6:18 PM  
Blogger Lisa said...

1) Could you be more specific? Who should have known of the Zohar who didn't? And how exactly do we ascertain such a thing? "Lack of evidence is not evidence of a lack", after all.

2) (I'm assuming that your reference to "Kabbalah" is meant to be a reference to the Zohar, right?)

How do you know that many of the acts the Zohar recommends weren't performed before the Zohar was committed to writing? There are various schools of thought in Niglah, after all. Why mightn't there be in Nistar?

3) Isaiah 59:21. We say it every day during U-va l'Tziyon:

"And for My part, this is My covenant with them," said Hashem. "My spirit which is upon them, and the words I have set in their mouths, shall not be lost from their mouths, or from their children's mouths, or from their children's children's mouths," said Hashem, "from now until eternity."

Yes, there've been groups of Jews who've gone off the derekh. You don't even need to point to the Sabbateans. Look at the heterodox groups in America today. Conservative, Reform, Reconstructionist, Renewal, Humanistic, Messianic, Meshichist Lubavitch, and plain old I-don't-want-to-be-different assimilationists.

But there's always been a core that remained. And there really isn't a core with a continuous history that rejects the Zohar as not being a valid part of the Torah. The Gra fought the early Hassidim bitterly, but he never rejected the Zohar.

The Rambam railed against certain minhagim, but the Rambam wasn't the only great rabbi in existence. There were many things he wrote that were disputed by other great rabbis of the time.

I'm not saying that the virtual witchcraft that the Rambam condemned was (or is) okay. I'm just saying that I wouldn't identify that with the Zohar.

And as far as the issue of being afraid to tamper with minhagim... that's an issue of authority. It's a serious problem, but it's one of minhagim. Not of the mesorah. Lacking a Sanhedrin, it's difficult, if not impossible, to claim universal halakhic authority. But this will pass.

9:38 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home